Introduction:
The release of Neeraj Ghaywan’s Homebound has done more than just sweep international awards; it has reopened a wound in the Indian collective consciousness that many were eager to let scar over. Adapted from Basharat Peer’s poignant New York Times essay, "A Friendship, a Pandemic and a Death Beside the Highway," the film is a brutal, 128-minute interrogation of what it means to belong to a nation that, in its moment of crisis, treated millions of its own citizens as "ghosts" in the machinery.
This comprehensive analysis explores the film through three lenses: the reality of the 2020 migration, the cinematic subversion of the "Uniform," and the ethical fallout that continues to haunt the production.
I. The Reality: From Devari to the Silver Screen
To understand Homebound, we must first step out of the theater and onto the asphalt of National Highway 3 in May 2020. The film finds its heartbeat in the real-life tragedy of Amrit Kumar and Mohammad Saiyub.
The Real Protagonists
In the real world, Amrit and Saiyub were childhood friends from the village of Devari in Uttar Pradesh. Like millions of others, they had migrated to Surat, Gujarat, to work in the grueling textile mills. They were the invisible hands that clothed the nation. When the unplanned lockdown of March 2020 was announced, the factory gates were padlocked, and their meager savings evaporated within weeks.
The Image That Shook the Nation
A viral photograph captured the essence of this tragedy: Saiyub, a Muslim man, sitting on the dusty roadside, cradling the head of a dying Amrit, a Dalit man. In that moment, the barriers of caste and religion—the very things that often divide Indian society—were dissolved by a bond of radical empathy.
II. The Politics of the "Uniform": Deconstructing the Dream
The most significant narrative shift Ghaywan makes is changing the protagonists' profession. In Peer’s original reportage, they are laborers; in the film, Chandan (Amrit) and Shoaib (Saiyub) are aspiring police constables.
Ambition as a Tool for Social Mobility
For a Dalit man and a Muslim man in India, the police uniform is not merely a job—it is a suit of armor. It represents an escape from ignominy and the promise of institutional dignity. However, the film uses the statistic of 2.5 million applicants for 3,500 seats to highlight the systemic cruelty of the meritocracy myth.
III. The Shattering of the Middle-Class Dream
While the protagonists come from a working-class background, their pursuit—the government job—is the ultimate "Middle-Class Dream" in the Indian subcontinent. It represents stability, social capital, and the end of generational poverty. Homebound meticulously portrays how this dream is not just delayed, but systematically scattered.
The Fragile Belief in Fairness
Chandan and Shoaib represent the "aspirational India." Their early mornings spent running on dirt tracks and late nights studying under dim bulbs are scenes of deep devotion to a system they believe is fair. The film shows their "middle-class dream" being pulverized in three distinct stages:
The Bureaucratic Wall: Even before the lockdown, the dream is scattered by the sheer impossibility of the numbers. The film highlights the "slow violence" of waiting for a result that may never come, as millions compete for a handful of seats.
The Lockdown as a Mirror: When the pandemic strikes, the state they wanted to serve suddenly treats them as a bio-hazard. The very "Uniform" they worshipped is now worn by men who beat them back with lathis. This irony is the ultimate betrayal of their aspiration; the dream of becoming the law is shattered by the reality of being victimized by it.
The Loss of "Standing Tall": The dream of a middle-class life is essentially a dream of "standing tall." When Chandan collapses on the highway, his physical descent to the ground is a metaphor for the final collapse of that aspiration. The dust of the highway literally and figuratively covers the exam books they carried in their backpacks—the relics of a future that will never happen.
IV. The Aesthetic of the Marginalized
Ghaywan employs what critics have termed an "Aesthetic of Exhaustion." The film focuses heavily on the body—the "somatic trauma" of the migration.
V. "Slow Violence": The Micro-aggressions of Daily Life
The pandemic was a sudden catastrophe, but the film argues that the characters were already living in a state of "slow violence."
The Gendered Silence of the Road
While the film focuses on Chandan and Shoaib, it subtly highlights the even greater vulnerability of women in the migration. The fleeting shots of women carrying children while balancing heavy bundles on their heads adds a layer of intersectional critique.
VI. Ethical Minefields: The Cost of "Truth"
As Homebound moves toward the Oscars, it is shadowed by controversies regarding plagiarism and the compensation gap for the real-life families. These issues raise uncomfortable questions about the ethics of using trauma as the basis for international cinema.
VII. Conclusion: The Journey That Never Ends
Homebound ends not with a resolution, but with a question. The film suggests that the "lockdown" was merely a physical manifestation of a social reality that has existed for centuries.
Discussion Questions for Film Students:
Symbolism: How does the "Police Entrance Exam" serve as a critique of the Indian Dream?
Ethics: Does a director have a moral obligation to share the profits of a "true story" film with the actual survivors?
Cinematography: How does the use of "low-angle shots" and close-ups of feet contribute to the "Aesthetic of Exhaustion"?
Caste and Religion: Compare the ways in which the film handles the "Othering" of a Dalit character versus a Muslim character.
Gender Dynamics: In what ways does the film portray the specific struggles of women during the migration, even as secondary character's.
References:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/399486487_Academic_Worksheet_on_Homebound
.png)
No comments:
Post a Comment