Introduction
Literature often gives special attention to kings, princes, heroes and other powerful figures. However, the people who remain at the margins of these stories can reveal a different and equally important picture of society. William Shakespeare's Hamlet and Tom Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead provide an interesting example of this idea. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are minor characters in Shakespeare's play, but Stoppard brings them to the centre of his own drama.
The Cultural Studies approach helps us understand these characters through the concepts of power, marginalization, ideology and social hierarchy. Prof. Dilip Barad's thinking activity specifically asks students to examine how Rosencrantz and Guildenstern become marginal figures and how their situation can be connected with modern corporate structures, where ordinary workers may sometimes be treated as replaceable or expendable.
1. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern as Marginal Figures in Hamlet
In Hamlet, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are childhood friends of Hamlet who are summoned to the Danish court by King Claudius and Queen Gertrude. Their purpose is not simply to meet their old friend. They are asked to observe Hamlet and discover the reason for his unusual behaviour.
Their position immediately places them within the power structure of the court. They do not act completely according to their own purposes. Instead, they become instruments of the king's political interests.
Hamlet recognizes their role. He understands that they have been sent to gather information about him. His famous description of Rosencrantz as a "sponge" is significant because a sponge absorbs whatever surrounds it. Hamlet suggests that Rosencrantz is absorbing the king's favour and information without possessing real independent power.
This reveals their expendability. Claudius uses them when they are useful and eventually sends them to England with a letter ordering Hamlet's death. They do not fully understand the larger political game in which they are participating. Once their usefulness ends, they themselves become disposable.
Therefore, their marginalization is not simply about being minor characters. It is about their position within a hierarchy in which powerful people make decisions and less powerful people carry them out.
2. From the Danish Court to the Modern Workplace
The situation of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern can be connected to modern corporate structures. The comparison does not mean that a workplace is identical to a royal court. Rather, both can illustrate how larger systems may place individuals in unequal positions of power.
In a large organization, decisions about restructuring, relocation, automation or downsizing may be made at a level far removed from ordinary employees. Workers may have little influence over these decisions even though those decisions directly affect their lives.
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern similarly have limited control over the decisions that determine their fate. They become part of Claudius's political plan without controlling that plan themselves.
The important Cultural Studies question is therefore: Who has the power to make decisions, and who is expected to simply follow them?
Their fate illustrates the vulnerability of people who occupy lower positions within a hierarchy. They are useful to those in power but are not themselves powerful enough to determine the outcome.
3. Stoppard's Existential Reinterpretation
Tom Stoppard changes the perspective completely in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. Shakespeare places Hamlet at the centre of the story, while Stoppard moves the two minor characters to the centre.
This change is important because Stoppard allows the audience to experience the world from the perspective of people who normally remain in the background.
The characters frequently struggle to understand where they are, what is happening to them and why they have been brought into the situation. Their uncertainty becomes an existential problem. They are caught in a story that seems to have been written before they can control their own actions.
Stoppard's title itself is significant. "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead" reveals their fate before the play reaches its conclusion. The audience therefore watches two characters move towards an ending that they cannot successfully prevent.
Their uncertainty can be compared with the experience of individuals who feel powerless within large institutions. A person may perform their responsibilities correctly while still having little control over larger decisions affecting their future.
Stoppard therefore transforms Shakespeare's minor characters into figures through whom audiences can think about identity, freedom, purpose and powerlessness.
4. Cultural and Economic Power Structures
Shakespeare and Stoppard present power differently, but both texts draw attention to people who exist below the major centres of authority.
In Hamlet, power is strongly connected with the monarchy. Claudius occupies the highest political position and can use other people to protect his authority. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are caught inside this structure.
Stoppard, however, shifts attention from the powerful ruler to the powerless individuals. His adaptation asks what happens when the people who are normally treated as background figures become the centre of the story.
This is particularly relevant to Cultural Studies because Cultural Studies examines how culture represents relationships between power and ordinary people. The activity itself encourages students to connect these literary situations with modern systems of corporate control and job insecurity.
The idea of the "little people" is therefore important. These are individuals who may have limited control over the institutions surrounding them. They can become invisible when attention is focused only on leaders and decision-makers.
5. Ideology, Power and Marginalization
The ideas of Cultural Studies theorists can deepen our understanding of the two plays.
Michel Foucault's discussion of power helps us understand that power does not operate only through direct force. It can also operate through systems, relationships and institutions. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern become part of the court's system of surveillance because they are asked to observe Hamlet.
Antonio Gramsci's concept of hegemony can also be connected to the play. People can participate in systems of power because those systems appear normal or legitimate. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern do not initially challenge the authority of the king. They participate in the structure that ultimately destroys them.
Louis Althusser's ideas about ideology can further help us consider how individuals become connected to larger systems of authority. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern act within the expectations of the royal hierarchy.
Stoppard's play makes these structures more visible by removing the characters from the background and giving them voices of their own.
6. The Dispensable "Asset"
One of the most important ideas raised by the activity is the idea of a person being treated as a dispensable asset.
In Shakespeare's play, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are valuable to Claudius as long as they can perform a particular function. They are sent to observe Hamlet and later become involved in the plan against him. Their individual identities are less important to the political system than their usefulness.
This creates a disturbing but meaningful parallel with modern organizational language. Words such as employee, resource, asset and workforce can sometimes make people appear primarily as functional units within a larger system.
The literary comparison encourages readers to ask whether institutions should be understood only through efficiency and usefulness, or whether the individual human being must remain visible within those systems.
This is where the Cultural Studies perspective becomes especially valuable. It encourages us to look beyond the central characters and powerful institutions and ask what happens to those who have less authority.
7. Personal Reflection
Studying Rosencrantz and Guildenstern through Cultural Studies changes the way minor characters can be understood. At first, they may appear to be simply two secondary characters who help move the plot forward. However, their position reveals an important relationship between the individual and the larger structures of power.
Their experience demonstrates that marginalization does not always mean complete invisibility. They are visible enough to be used by those in authority, but they are not powerful enough to control their own circumstances.
This distinction is important in understanding modern society as well. Individuals participate in institutions such as schools, workplaces, governments and other organizations, but their ability to influence decisions may vary according to their position within those structures.
Stoppard's play makes us pause and consider the people who normally remain at the edges of important stories. By giving Rosencrantz and Guildenstern a central voice, he makes the marginalized visible.
Conclusion
Hamlet and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead demonstrate how literature can expose relationships between power and marginalization. Shakespeare presents Rosencrantz and Guildenstern as minor figures caught in Claudius's political machinery, while Stoppard reimagines them as central characters struggling with uncertainty, identity and purpose.
The comparison with modern corporate systems further shows how Cultural Studies can connect literature with contemporary social structures. The important issue is not simply that individuals can become powerless. It is that institutions may determine whose voices matter and whose experiences remain in the background.
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern therefore become more than minor characters. They represent the people who exist within powerful systems but have limited control over those systems. Their story reminds readers that behind every large political, economic or institutional structure are individuals whose lives can be deeply affected by decisions made above them.
The movement from Shakespeare's royal court to Stoppard's existential world ultimately raises a continuing Cultural Studies question: How do systems of power shape the lives, identities and possibilities of the people who occupy their margins?
References
Barad, Dilip. “Thinking Activity: Exploring Marginalization in Shakespeare's Hamlet and Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead.” ResearchGate, 2024.
Foucault, Michel. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. Edited by Colin Gordon, Pantheon, 1980.
Gramsci, Antonio. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Edited and translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith, International Publishers, 1971.
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Project Gutenberg, 1999.
Stoppard, Tom. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. Grove Press, 1967.
No comments:
Post a Comment